![]() Given the price of the package, you can't really go wrong. It adds some Sonnox-style saturation which can be great on the right stuff. 2: Add a Brickwall Limiter in the final slot. Make notes on anything you feel might need to be altered. Pay close attention to the stereo spread, frequency balance and dynamic response of the track. ![]() I also like the Limiter in 'Advanced' mode. Mastering With T-RackS 1: Add your track, or tracks to T-RackS and play through them several times. Set the Output Ceiling at -1dB and for now, leave the Input at 0dB. The same applies to the IK Pultec: it is modeled in an extremely realistic way. 1: Add your track, or tracks to T-RackS and play through them several times. Most mastering tube compressors share this possibility if I'm correct, and this is simply not possible with the versions by Waves and UA. Even the input drive is modelled, which allows you to give your tracks some tube-warmth by cranking it, even without using any compression. There's a thread over at KVR Audio where this plugin is heavily analyzed. The IK Fairchild on the other hand, is extremely well modeled. ![]() UA focussed on the compression curves, rather than on the harmonic distortion and other stuff going on in this beast which combined with those curves results in its unique sound. If I'm right, this wasn't even tried due to lack of DSP power, i.e. Its compression might be very nice, but it lacks in emulating the sound of a real Fairchild, regardless of its compression characteristics. Especially the UA version is outdated imho. The modeling of the Fairchild and Pultec is done using a far more accurate method than the one applied by Waves and UA. Sure it can give you good results on the appropriate material, but there are far more advanced limiters out there by now with algorithms that will smoke the one in L2 99 out of a 100 times.Ĭoncerning T-Racks, I really like it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |